We had this discussion with the fellow programmers, about learning new programming languages and technologies, and generally doing the work which is not just something that you are not really get paid for, but also you don't get any visible benefit at all from doing it. You don't produce any measurable value.
As in, for example, writing a throw-away code in some new programming language just for the sake of learning that language itself.
The notion of "throw-away code" turns out to be more painful than it could be expected: quite often people get extremely personally attached to their designs, algorithms, code, and time spent on some certain activity in general. So, how come one can even remotely be attached to the throw-away "garbage"?..
That takes different forms and flavours: one feels sorry that he had spent years in the university studying something which does not seem to help to find a job, others are reluctant to get interested in anything outside their own area of expertise ("we don't have time for that, it's not our job"). In the case of programmers, in particular, it often turns out in discarding any kind of mentioning related to the technologies, programming languages, libraries, development methodologies, practices which appear to be unrelated to their job.
That's not just cognitive biases in action (which I wholeheartedly confess in being affected by myself), but also pure and perfectly reasonable human behavior, which does it's best to optimize the actions taken by the human being.
So, why would one voluntarily do anything, which is deemed to be discarded almost instantly?
Now, here is where comes a programmer's workout metaphor into action.
Consider yourself going to the gym, and spending some hours per week there, doing the exercises. What you do there, that "weight's pumping" is nothing else as taking heavy things at one place and lifting them up many times during some period of time, just to put those weights back to their place in the end.
So, without any doubt, whatever happens there is:
- does not give any visible outcome in the end (those weights end up in the original position).
What's the point, then?.. What is the point in doing something, which is barely enjoyable, and gives no visible outcome immediately?
The stock answer would be that benefit is invisible, long term, and whatnot.
But I honestly think that there really is no point, unless you can tune yourself into the state, where you can consistently come up with short-term achievable goals, and furthermore have the feeling of the success every time those goals are achieved.
So, you've pumped up that thing 12 times two days ago?.. what about adding a couple of kilos on top today and do the same? What about going an extra mile?.. Can you spend 10 more minutes in the gym today?.. You can't?.. Well, it's fine, who cares, there's always next time to try again.
You make this small game out of seemingly boring endeavor, and then eventually, unnoticeably you get to the point where you get used to the process and you start to like it.
You start to enjoy it.
And then, what happens next? The forementioned long-term success comes, that's what happens. You don't really feel it "suddenly coming". At that point it's already with you, and it's hard to tell a difference. But it's there. You see it when you start looking at your old photos. Or at your old code, for that matter.
And even if it does not do it that soon - who cares, that was just a game, right?
So, you get a positive outcome out from doing those throw-away exercises, producing the value from nothing.
What really happens is building a solid background, be it physical or intellectual.
The only problem is that this building can be very routine and hard.
In this case helping yourself into making it a game can help a lot.